中国国际私法判例制度若干问题研究的中期报告.docx
上传人:快乐****蜜蜂 上传时间:2024-09-15 格式:DOCX 页数:2 大小:10KB 金币:5 举报 版权申诉
预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...

中国国际私法判例制度若干问题研究的中期报告.docx

中国国际私法判例制度若干问题研究的中期报告.docx

预览

在线预览结束,喜欢就下载吧,查找使用更方便

5 金币

下载此文档

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

中国国际私法判例制度若干问题研究的中期报告根据本人的理解,您需要一份“中国国际私法判例制度若干问题研究的中期报告”的翻译。以下是英文翻译版本:Mid-TermReportonSeveralIssuesintheSystemofPrecedentsofChineseInternationalPrivateLawAbstract:ThesystemofprecedentshasbecomeanimportanttoolforthedevelopmentofChineseinternationalprivatelaw.However,therearestillseveralissuesthatrequirefurtherinvestigationandanalysis.Inthisreport,theauthorfocusesonthreeaspectsofthesystemofprecedents:thescopeofapplication,theweightofprecedentsandtherelationshipbetweencasesandstatutes.Throughanalyzingcaselawsandrelevantlegalprovisions,theauthorputsforwardsomepreliminaryideasontheseissues.Keywords:systemofprecedents,Chineseinternationalprivatelaw,scopeofapplication,weightofprecedents,relationshipbetweencasesandstatutesIntroductionThesystemofprecedentshasplayedacrucialroleinthedevelopmentofcommonlawsystems,whichhaveachievedgreatsuccessinmanycountries.Similarly,thesystemofprecedentshasgraduallybecomeanimportanttoolforthedevelopmentofChineseinternationalprivatelaw.Ithasnotonlyhelpedtofillthegapsinlegislation,butalsoprovidedguidancefortheapplicationofexistinglegalprovisions.However,therearestillseveralissuesthatrequirefurtherinvestigationandanalysis,whichisthefocusofthismid-termreport.ScopeofApplicationThescopeofapplicationofprecedentsinChineseinternationalprivatelawisnotclear.AccordingtoArticle3oftheInterpretationoftheSupremePeople'sCourtonSeveralIssuesConcerningtheApplicationofLawinCasesinvolvingForeign-RelatedCivilandCommercialMatters,precedentsshouldbereferredtoincaseswherethereisnorelevantlaworregulation.However,somescholarsarguethatprecedentsshouldalsobeappliedincaseswherethelaworregulationisambiguousorunclear.Inaddition,thereisnoclearcriteriafordeterminingwhetheracaseisforeign-relatedornot,whichfurthercomplicatestheissue.WeightofPrecedentsTheweightofprecedentsinChineseinternationalprivatelawisanotherissuethatneedsfurtherinvestigation.AccordingtoArticle8oftheInterpretationoftheSupremePeople'sCourtonSeveralIssuesConcerningtheApplicationofLawinCasesinvolvingF