自我欺骗、自我否定与自我重建:《浮世画家》中作为拟像的记忆.docx
上传人:15****47 上传时间:2024-09-10 格式:DOCX 页数:71 大小:147KB 金币:10 举报 版权申诉
预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...

自我欺骗、自我否定与自我重建:《浮世画家》中作为拟像的记忆.docx

自我欺骗、自我否定与自我重建:《浮世画家》中作为拟像的记忆.docx

预览

免费试读已结束,剩余 61 页请下载文档后查看

10 金币

下载此文档

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

PAGE\*MERGEFORMATVIIIPAGE\*MERGEFORMATVIIAbstractThisthesisfocusesonthememorymanipulationofMasujiOno,theprotagonistofKazuoIshiguro’ssecondnovelAnArtistoftheFloatingWorldbyutilizingGillesDeleuze’sphilosophyofsimulacrum.Theprojectcombinestheconceptofsimulacrumwithmemory,justifiesmemory’positionofsimulacrum,andonthisbasisilluminatesOno’smemorybecomingrealizedthroughhisunreliablefirstpersonnarrative.TheIntroductionpresentsfirstlythegeneralinformationaboutKazuoIshiguroandhissecondnovelAnArtistoftheFloatingWorld,secondlytheliteraturereviewoftheexistingcriticismfrombothabroadandathome,andlastlythetheoreticalframeworkandbasicstructureofthepresentstudy.ChapterTwo,“MemorySimulacrumandMemoryManipulation”,elaboratesfirstlythejustificationofthememory’spositionofbeingdeemedassimulacrumandhowmemorymakessensefromtheperspectiveofbeingsimulacrum,inwhichtwopointsareincorporated:oneismemory’sdeceptivenatureandanotheristheaffirmationofmemoryitself,whereinthevirtualandactualsignificancearemanifested;Secondlytheprotagonists’memorymanipulationinKazuoIshiguro’sprosesincludingtheanalysisofthereasonwhymemoryisakindofmanipulation,themotivationofprotagonists’memorymanipulation,andthebestandmostconvenientwayofsuchmemorymanipulation:theunreliablefirstpersonnarrativewhichmainlyreferstotwopoints:firstistheargumentationofwhytheprotagonists’narrativeisunreliableandsecondisthelogicalrelationshipbetweenunreliablenarrativeandmemorymanipulation.ChapterThree,“BecomingofMultiplicityandDifference:WaysofMasujiOno’sMemoryManipulation”,expoundsspecificallythethreemainformsofMasujiOno’sunreliablefirstpersonnarrative,thewayofhismemorymanipulation.Thefirstmanipulationformis“EvadingfromtheDisgracedReality:MemoryBecomingofSelf-Deception”,whichisanalyzedfromtwoaspectsofOno’smemorybecomingofself-deception:thefirstisOno’sdeceivinghimselfthathestillpossessesthe“prestigious”socialpositionbyindulginghimselfinhismemoryofthepast;thesecondisOno’sself-deceptiveself-justificationforhisculpablebehaviorsofservin