ARE_YOUR_PROJECTS_FAILING_BECAUSE_OF_GROUP_DYNAMIC.doc
上传人:sy****28 上传时间:2024-09-10 格式:DOC 页数:3 大小:14KB 金币:16 举报 版权申诉
预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...

ARE_YOUR_PROJECTS_FAILING_BECAUSE_OF_GROUP_DYNAMIC.doc

ARE_YOUR_PROJECTS_FAILING_BECAUSE_OF_GROUP_DYNAMICS.doc

预览

在线预览结束,喜欢就下载吧,查找使用更方便

16 金币

下载此文档

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

AreYourProjectsFailingBecauseofGroupDynamics?ByDavidBohl"Ifyou'reworkinginabiggroup,you'refightinghumannature."SosaysNathanZookinarecentarticlefor37Signals.Infact,theresearchshowsthatthemosteffectiveandefficientprojectgroupstendtobeintherangeof8to14people.ReferringtoareportonbusinessauthorAntonyJay'sbook,TheCorporationMan,ZooksaysthattheidealgroupsizehashistoricallyhoveredaroundwhatJaycallsa"ten-group."Applecallsthesegroups"2-pizzateams,"meaningthattheentireteamcanbefedwithtwopizzas-mostoftheirbestproductshavebeentheresultof2-pizzateams.Withinagroupthatsize,decisionsaremadequicklyandcollectively,effortisevenlydistributedandactionsarehighlymobileandquicklymaneuverable.Letthegroupgetlargerthanthat,however,anditgetsunwieldy.Decisionshavetobeformallydiscussedinaseriesofmeetings,asmembersofalargergroupareoftenoutoftheloop.Somemembersmayslackofforhavetheirvoicesdrownedoutbyothermorecharismaticmembers.Eventually,largergroupsdevolveintocliquesandothersubgroupsasthegroupdynamictriestoequalizeitselfaroundtheideal,slowingtheworkandstymieingprogress.Whetheryou'releadingaprojectteamatwork,organizingachurchcommitteeorstartingapoliticalactiongroup,youshouldkeepthisdynamicinmindwhenchoosingyourteam.Butwhatisit,exactly,thatmakesaten-groupsuchaneffectivesize?Andhowcanyousuccessfullystaffyourteamforbesteffect?Hereareafewfactorsyoushouldbeawareof:Thevalueofindividualcontributions.Groupsintheidealrangeencourageeveryonetomakeacontribution,andallowthosecontributionstobepowerfulandcreaterealresults.Theypermiteveryone'svoicetobeheard.Bychoosingadiversevarietyofparticipants-whetherculturally,personallyorprofessionally-youmaximizethisdynamicbygettingthebenefitofabroadrangeexperience,wisdomandideas.Inalargergroup,however,voicescangetlostortrampledoverbyotherswithstrongerpersonalitiesorthosetryingtohogthespotlight.Whichbringsustothesecondpoint...Equalrecognition.Inasmallergroup,everyoneworksasacohesiveteamandsharesinthesuccessorfailure.Bycreatingagroupt