新G和老G，在给的材料上基本没有什么变化，惟一多出来的是8个instruction，这8个instruction就是让我们从不同的视角去剖析材料中的逻辑错误。首先，官方指南明确指出，在阅读材料的时候，需要弄清楚材料中的以下一些内容：1：材料中提供了哪些证明，支持或证据。2：材料中明确地提出了哪些观点或结论。3：材料中提出了哪些假设，而且这些假设可能没有经过证明。4：材料中有哪些哪些暗示。然后是8个instruction：1.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatspecificevidenceisneededtoevaluatetheargumentandexplainhowtheevidencewouldweakenorstrengthentheargument.2.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscussoneormorealternativeexplanationsthatcouldrivaltheproposedexplanationandexplainhowyourexplanation(s)canplausiblyaccountforthefactspresentedintheargument.3.Writearesponseinwhichyouexaminethestatedand/orunstatedassumptionsoftheargument.Besuretoexplainhowtheargumentdependsontheseassumptionsandwhattheimplicationsarefortheargumentiftheassumptionsproveunwarranted.4.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeansweredinordertodecidewhethertherecommendationislikelytohavethepredictedresult.Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothesequestionswouldhelptoevaluatetherecommendation.5.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeansweredinordertodecidewhethertherecommendationandtheargumentonwhichitisbasedarereasonable.Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothesequestionswouldhelptoevaluatetherecommendation.6.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeansweredinordertodecidewhetherthepredictionandtheargumentonwhichitisbasedarereasonable.Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothesequestionswouldhelptoevaluatetheprediction.7.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeansweredinordertodecidewhethertheadviceandtheargumentonwhichitisbasedarereasonable.Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothesequestionswouldhelptoevaluatetheadvice.8.Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeaddressedinordertodecidewhethertheconclusionandtheargumentonwhichitisbasedarereasonable.Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothequestionswouldhelptoevaluatetheconclusion.我认为这8个instruction其实可以归结为4个。而且从本质上来说它们又都是一样的，都基于材料中的逻辑错误。