linguistic-analyses-of-english-non-finite--ing-ver.doc
上传人:天马****23 上传时间:2024-09-12 格式:DOC 页数:63 大小:266KB 金币:10 举报 版权申诉
预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...

免费试读已结束,剩余 53 页请下载文档后查看

10 金币

下载此文档

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

PAGEviiLinguisticAnalysesofEnglishNon-finite-ingVerbFormsAbstractEnglishmainverbsalwaysplayadominantroleinthesentence.Dependingonwhethertheyaremarkedintermsoftenseormood,verbsareclassifiedintofiniteandnon-finite.Somegrammarians,representedbyOttoJespersen(1933;1940),A.J.Thomson(1980)andA.V.Martinet(1980),thinkthatinfinitive,participle(-ingparticipleand-ed/enparticiple)andgerundarethreenon-finiteverbforms.ButothergrammarianslikeRandolphQuirk(1974;1980;1985),SidneyGreenbaum(1974;1980;1985),GeoffreyLeech(1980;1985),JanSvartvik(1980;1985),etc.holdtheviewthatthereareonlytwonon-finiteverbforms–infinitiveandparticiple(ibid).Theyusetheterm“-ingclause”tocoverthetwoforms–-ingparticipleandgerundwholly,buttheysimultaneouslypointoutthat-ingclausescontainnominalcharacters.RonaldWardhaugh(1995:25)mentioned“classboundaries”betweenverbalnoun(gerund)andadjectiveparticiple.JohnSinclair(1990)borrowstheterm“phase”toexplainthecollocationofverbsinasentence.RodneyHuddleston(1988:63)usestheterm“catenative”todiscusstheusagesofnon-finitecomplements,butinhisbook“theCambridgeGrammaroftheEnglishLanguage”(2002:78-81)heusesothergrammaticaltermslike“gerundialnoun”,“participialadjective”,and“gerund-participleformofverb”todescribethecharactersofnon-finite-ingverbform.InChina,thesameviewsasmentionedabovealsoexistinmostEnglishgrammarbooks.ZhangDaozhen(1995)andBoBing(2004)approvetheclassificationgivenbyOttoJespersenetalfornearlyhalfacentury;WangJialing(1980)andZhangZhenbang(2003)agreetotheviewpointofRandolphQuirketal.Furthermore,inrecentyearssomekeyjournalsandperiodicalshaveissuedmanyarticlestitledbythetermsofpresent/pastparticiple,gerundornominalizedverbalnounetc.,whichseemstoleadtochaosformostlearnersseekingtounderstandthe-ingverbform.Consideringthepartmentionedabove,thewriterofthispaperhasfoundthatthereisawidedisagreementamongscholarsastotheclassificationofthenon-finite-ingverbformanditsusages.Thetermsandcharacteristicsofthe-ingformareoftenmixedandmisunderstoodanditsusageshavealsoprovedambig