STYLEREF"标题1"\*MERGEFORMAT摘要中国政法大学硕士学位论文拒不执行错误的判决、裁定是否构成犯罪—以刑法的价值为视角论文编号：拒不执行错误的判决、裁定是否构成犯罪－以刑法的价值为视角摘要拒不执行判决、裁定罪的犯罪对象是否包括错误的判决、裁定(本文所称的错误判决、裁定特指在对行为人定罪量刑时无瑕疵但后来被认定为有瑕疵的判决、裁定),这在我国刑法理论界存在很大争议：有人认为应当包括错误的裁判，否则司法权威和法治秩序就会面临明显而即刻的危险；有人认为，不应当包括错误的裁判，因为错误的裁判从实质上而言不具有合法性。本文共由三部分组成：第一部分，以一个案例导入，找出产生以上争议的根源不在于刑法解释的立场的不同，而在于刑法价值观念的不同。第二部分，对我国刑法理论界有关刑法价值的探讨进行简要梳理，并对刑法的正当性和刑法的谦抑性进行重点论述。第三部分，以上部分的体系，结合拒不执行判决、裁定罪在司法实践中的具体适用情况，来论证认定拒不执行错误的判决、裁定构成犯罪并不违反刑法的公正性和谦抑性。关键词：刑法解释刑法价值构成犯罪AbstractDOESREFUSINGTOEXECUTETHEWRONGJUDGMENTSORORDERSCONSTITUTEACRIMININALOFFENCE－FROMTHEPERSPECTIVEOFTHEVALUEOFCRIMINALLAWABSTRACTDoestheobjectofrefusingtoexecutethejudgmentsorordersincludethewrongjudgmentsororders(inthispaper,thewrongjudgmentsorordersrefertothejudgmentsororders,whicharerightwhensuspectsaresuedbutareconfirmedwronglater)?Inourcountry,thereisabigcontroversyinthefieldofcriminallaw:somepeoplethinkthatthewrongjudgmentsorordersshouldbeincluded,orjudicialauthorityandtheorderoflawwillfaceaclearandimmediatedanger;somepeoplesaythatbecausethewrongjudgmentsorordersarenotlegitimateinessence,sotheyshouldnotbeincluded.Thispaperconsistsofthreeparts：inpartone,beginningwithacase,Iwillpointthatthesourceofabovecontroversyliesinthedifferentvalueofcriminallawnotinthepositionofinterpretationofcriminallaw.Inparttwo,thesystemofvaluesofcriminallawwillbearranged,andthelegitimacyandtoleranceofthecriminallawaretobemainlydiscussed.Inpartthree,Iwillprovethatidentifyingrefusingtoexecutethewrongjudgmentsorordersasacriminaloffencedoesnotviolatethelegitimacyandtoleranceofcriminallaw,throughthejudicialpractice.KEYWORDS:interpretationofcriminallawthevalueofcriminallawconstituteacriminaloffenceSTYLEREF"标题1"\*MERGEFORMAT致谢目录TOC\o"1-3"\h\z\uHYPERLINK\l"_Toc382982545"摘要PAGEREF_Toc382982545\hIHYPERLINK\l"_Toc382982546"ABSTRACTPAGEREF_Toc382982546\hIHYPERLINK\l"_Toc382982548"引言PAGEREF_Toc382982548\hIHYPERLINK\l"_Toc382982549"第一章问题的提出及我国刑法理论对此问题的回应PAGEREF_Toc38298254